The Solution Path: Building the bridge between actual and target state
The crew is ready, the foundation has been checked and the compass is set. Now comes the toughest discipline: how do you turn a vision into a workable plan? The solution path closes the gap between the status quo and the target picture, transparently, with no black box and, above all, without the dangerous "Guesswork Trap".
A clear solution path is more than an Excel list of tasks. It is the charter of a mission. Anyone who only guessed in the earlier steps is building bridges here that will never meet in the middle.
To turn vague statements of intent into real results, you need structure:
The 4 pillars of a solid solution path
Gap analysis (actual vs. target)
Which concrete discrepancies separate us from the goal? We assess options not by gut feeling, but by their impact on budget, time, benefit and risk.
Method & implementation
How do we close the gaps in practical terms? Which resources and methods are needed? A workable plan accounts for dependencies before they become blockers.
Prioritization (timing vs. scope)
What really matters? Do we need to hit the deadline first, or the feature scope? Anyone who does not make this decision up front loses control as the project unfolds.
Roadmap & milestones
What is the very first, immediately actionable step? Visible milestones give the crew confidence and make progress tangible for all stakeholders.
The maturity check: Are you ready to implement?
A plan is only as good as its reliability. Where does your project stand right now?
The four maturity levels
The approach and the gaps are roughly named. A concrete comparison between actual and target state is still missing.
The key gaps are identified and solution options are sketched out. Detail is still missing.
The gaps are documented, the solution paths look realistic and are partly prioritized.
The implementation path is firmly agreed. Measures, timings and risks are crystal clear.
Conclusion of the series: Structure saves real money
Defining these four perspectives cleanly (Crew Power, starting point, target picture and solution path) sounds like a lot of work. And to be honest: it is.
But here is the truth: the critical topics do not disappear just because you ignore them at the start. Instead, they pop up during implementation, at the worst possible moment and with maximum cost consequences. Anyone who does their homework in these four areas not only minimizes risks, but actively protects their budget.
Only those who know where they stand and how they will reach the goal make the right platform decision and avoid the expensive surprises in the lifecycle of a shop system.
Checklist: The final check before launch
Have we documented all gaps between the actual state and the target picture in writing?
Is there a concrete solution approach defined for every gap?
Is there a roadmap with clear responsibilities and deadlines?
Do we have a "plan B" for known risks?
Is the first milestone defined in a way that lets us start right away?
The other perspectives:
01
Crew perspective: Who does what, how and when?
This is not about org charts, but about real role clarity. Who decides what? Who contributes? What does the communication matrix look like? Commitment only emerges when the "you take him, I've got him covered" mindset is replaced by clear responsibilities.
02
The starting point: Where do we stand right now?
A project never starts on a greenfield. An honest inventory of the existing systems (ERP, PIM, CRM), data flows and processes is mandatory. When documentation is missing and only "legacy knowledge" exists in the heads of individual employees, that is a massive project risk. And who has not, at some point, received this answer to a question in a project: "Only Klaus knows that, and he's not in today."
03
A clear target picture: Where do we want to end up?
A target picture is far more than a feature list. It defines the business vision, target markets and, above all, the KPIs by which success is measured. While detailed plans often fall apart at the first problem, a strategic target picture keeps the project on course even in stormy phases.
You might also be interested in
The Guesswork Trap: Why digital projects fail before they begin
Most digital projects fail not because of the chosen technology, but because of a dangerous mix of unclear starting points, vague requirements and unclear responsibilities.
Crew Power: Why the best strategy fails without the right team
In practice, success is often decided not by tools or budgets, but by people.
The Starting Point: Why a foundation made of toothpicks brings down every project
Anyone building a house checks the ground first. Anyone starting a digital project often skips this step.